JTON Music has responded to allegations made by singer Qing Madi, insisting that it has never threatened, harassed, or intimidated the fast-rising artist amid their ongoing legal battle.
-
JTON Music denied threatening or intimidating Qing Madi in any form.
-
The label said the dispute is a legal and commercial matter involving contractual rights and investments.
-
JTON clarified that a Lagos High Court granted part of its injunction request pending the final determination of the case.
The record label issued a statement on June 5, 2026, following claims by Qing Madi that its founder, Joy Tongo, was involved in financial misconduct, forgery, and efforts to derail her music career.
JTON Music Says Dispute Is Strictly Legal and Commercial
The controversy gained momentum after Qing Madi publicly accused her former label boss during a TikTok live session. The singer alleged that the company had removed her Barely Legal EP from streaming platforms and was attempting to sabotage her professional growth.
In response, JTON Music stated that the matter originated in court and not in the public space. According to the company, its actions are aimed at protecting investments, contractual obligations, and opportunities created during its professional relationship with the singer.
The label maintained that it has no personal issues with Qing Madi and rejected claims that the dispute is rooted in intimidation or bullying.
“JTON has no personal issue with the artist. This matter is not about intimidation, bullying, or any threat to her person. It is a legal and commercial dispute concerning rights, obligations, investment, and the protection of works and opportunities developed during the course of a professional relationship.”
The company further dismissed allegations of threats, describing such claims as inaccurate and misleading.
“JTON categorically states that it has not threatened the artist, nor has it authorised anyone to threaten, harass, intimidate, or endanger her in any way. Any suggestion to the contrary is completely denied.”
Label Explains Court Decision and Contractual Obligations
Addressing reports surrounding the recent court proceedings, JTON Music argued that the ruling by the High Court of Lagos State has been widely misunderstood.
According to the label, the court granted part of its interlocutory injunction application, temporarily restricting Qing Madi from releasing, publishing, or performing music allegedly produced, financed, or promoted under JTON pending the final resolution of the lawsuit.
“The Court did not hold that JTON had no case. In fact, the Court granted part of JTON’s interlocutory injunction application and restrained the artist from releasing, publishing, or performing music, recordings, or content produced, promoted, or financed under JTON and entering into new agreement or deals using the brand or professional platform developed by JTON pending the determination of the suit.”
The company also revealed that it has existing recording and distribution agreements with Sony Music and Bu Vision, emphasizing that those agreements remain binding and must be respected by all parties involved.
JTON added that every step taken so far has been conducted within legal frameworks and remains subject to judicial oversight in both Nigeria and New York.
Also Read: Qing Madi Accuses Former Manager of Forgery and Sabotage as Songs Vanish from Spotify
The label urged fans, media organisations, and industry observers to avoid spreading unverified information while legal proceedings continue.
“We urge the public, media platforms, commentators, and fans to allow the judicial process to take its course and to refrain from spreading unverified claims that may prejudice the ongoing proceedings.”
As the dispute continues, JTON Music reiterated its commitment to honouring valid contractual agreements and pursuing a resolution through the courts rather than through public confrontations.
